Showing posts with label Hewitt Associates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hewitt Associates. Show all posts

Monday, November 24, 2008

Workers Cautious about 401(k) Investments

Reuters is reporting (via Yahoo! Finance):

Workers are increasingly cautious about investing in corporate retirement funds, having shifted money out of stocks, reduced how much they contribute and, in some cases, stopped contributions altogether or withdrawn money, according to a study released on Monday.


This is bad news for stock mutual funds as this report is confirming a trend we already knew existed:

Stock holdings now account for 53.8 percent of assets, down more than 14 percentage points from a year ago. The decline reflects both the changes in allocation and the lower value of stock holdings.

Hewitt's analysis included 2.7 million U.S. employees and data collected through October.

INCREASED TRADING

"We're certainly seeing higher trading activity as people got their statements in the mail. The bad news is kind of sinking in," Hess said.

So far in November, balance transfers from equities are up further, with the money transferred to bond and stable value funds, as well as balanced funds, which mix equities, bonds and other assets with an eye toward preserving capital.

New money input into stock funds is also trending lower:

More employers have put in incentives to invest, such as increasing their match, and some workers -- tempted by lower prices -- have increased contributions, she said. However, the proportion of new money dedicated to stocks is at an all-time low, at 58 percent.

Also, another confirmation of trend of increased withdrawals and declining participation rates:

Some employees, especially in economically sensitive sectors like retail, have stopped contributing altogether. Also, since the credit crunch has made borrowing more difficult, more employees are also tapping 401(k)s for cash.

Overall, 6 percent of employees pulled money out, up from 5.4 percent a year ago. So-called hardship withdrawals, in which workers have to meet certain criteria but are still liable for penalties and additional taxes, are up 16 percent. Loans, which often come with low interest rates, are a better option, Hess said.

One factor to watch in coming months, according to Hewitt: More employers may need to reduce their 401(k) matches to conserve cash. In 2002, about 5 percent of companies cut back their matching contributions.

Whether current trends continue depends on the stock market's performance, Hess said.

"Some of the opt-outs could accelerate, the trading activity could accelerate, if markets keep going down. It's starting to scare people that it could be more than just the little dip that we saw back when the tech bubble burst."

This study is presenting some sobering thoughts for those in the industry. Now we know why the asset manager such as the likes of Fidelity are laying off staff due to the market downturn, as declines in asset values lead to lower management fee collections which is a direct hit to revenue.

Friday, July 11, 2008

Weekend - DOL Blotter - Enron Flashback

It was a slow news week at the Department of Labor's EBSA enforcement division - so this time we will take this opportunity to review some Enron-related goings on in February and March 2008 which actually related to Hewitt, the behemoth HR outsourcer. This issue has largely stayed out of the mainstream media news coverage.

On February 7, 2008, the DOL posted a news release on it's website: "U.S. Labor Department seeks contempt order against Hewitt over improper distribution of assets from Enron litigation settlement fund." The news release claimed:


The U.S. Department of Labor today announced that it has asked a federal district court in Houston, Texas, to hold Hewitt Associates LLC in civil contempt for failing to comply with an allocation formula approved by the court when it disbursed court-supervised settlement funds to Enron employees at the end of 2006. The proposed motion for civil contempt must be approved by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.


Hewitt caused the settlement fund to have insufficient cash to pay Enron workers, retirees and beneficiaries all amounts due them. The fund holds recoveries obtained by the department and class-action plaintiffs in related lawsuits regarding Enron's pension plans. Even with other corrective action being undertaken by parties to fix the misallocation, there will be a $9.15 million shortfall in the settlement fund as a result of Hewitt's noncompliance with the court-approved allocation formula. Hewitt served as the administrator for the settlement fund.

"This department has been relentless in seeking to protect the retirement security of America's workers and their families," said U.S. Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao. "With this legal action we are seeking to ensure that the pension plan participants receive all the funds they are entitled to."

Hewitt did not perform the allocation correctly and some participants received too much in settlement proceeds at the expense of the remaining participants — amounting to $22 million being overpaid. The settlement fund now has insufficient funds to pay the correct amounts to participants who were underpaid.

The Labor Department asks the court to require Hewitt to provide funds sufficient to permit the allocation of settlement funds in accordance with the allocation formula approved by the court. The department also asks the court to prohibit Hewitt from collection, repayment and other actions against participants who received overpayments without the court's permission. The department's motion is in addition to a separate motion filed by Enron to hold Hewitt 100 percent responsible for an interest-free loan to Enron's pension plan for the full amount needed to make whole the underpaid participants.

Then, inside of one month, the DOL posted this news release: "Hewitt and Enron to restore $11.2 million to Enron litigation settlement fund"

Thus bringing an end to the sordid pension drama (just kidding). The news release quoted Secretary Chao stating that this settlement will result in "...all pension plan participants will receive all the funds to which they are entitled."

What was left unaddressed was what about the participants who were overpaid?